Please take this quiz if you would like to receive 1 CAMPEP credit for attending the webinar, Practical Guidelines for TPS Commissioning and QA. A score of 8/10 or higher is required to receive credit. If you score below 80%, hit the "Try Again" button when your results appear. Contact [email protected] Com with any questions.
Beam, IGRT and mechanical component quality assurance
Beam data acquisition techniques
Dosimetric commissioning including beam data acquisition, modeling and validation
Evaluation of heterogeneity correction accuracy
Any dosimeter available to the physicist
Ion chambers and electronic arrays with sufficient resolution
Ion chamber arrays only
Ion chamber and film only
Collect minimum data according to vendor’s guidelines
Use vendor-provided golden data
Collect a subset of vendor-recommended data to spot-check golden data
Collect vendor-recommended data set plus extra for validation comparisons
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
2% of the central axis dose
3% of the central axis dose
2% of the local dose
3% of the local dose
Pencil beam
Collapsed Cone convolution
Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm
Grid-Based Boltzmann Solver
None of the above – any inhomogeneity correction is sufficiently accurate in practice
To compare the TPS dose to a well-benchmarked Mote-Carlo code for a variety of clinical conditions.
To perform measurements in an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom with film and ion chamber for a variety of clinical conditions.
To perform a set of off-axis dose measurements in a simple heterogeneous phantom for a 30x30cm2 beam.
To spot-check inhomogeneity correction on a central axis in a simple phantom for a smaller (eg 5x5 cm2 beam).
Cite a reference on inhomogeneity correction accuracy for a same type algorithm in the commissioning report.
1% dose-error / 1mm distance to agreement
2%/2mm
3%/3mm
5%/3mm
None of the above
1% dose-error / 1mm distance to agreement
2%/2mm
3%/3mm
5%/3mm
None of the above