Formal Requirements to Create an Express Trust

Doctrine of i ncorp by

12 cards   |   Total Attempts: 183
  

Cards In This Set

Front Back
Belton v CIR
Intervivos express trusts for property do not need to be in writing- express dec intended to be final and binding is sufficient.
Mountain v styak
Writing by a trustee (rather than the settlor) was sufficient evidence of the existence of a trust. Here, grandmother had transferred property to daughter who wrote letter to son that he and sister to inherit property equally.
Rochefoucauld v Bousted
Equity will not permit a stat to be an instrument of fraud. Couldnt rely on stat requirement for writing to ignore oral evidence of a trust.
Re Bourke
Requirements for incorporating a doc by reference: 1) Doc must be in existence at time will signed 2) Must be referred to in will as being in existence 3)Must be described with sufficient particularity to enable it to be identified.
Re Goods of Lady Truro
Made an inventory of silverware after the will was signed. Could still be incorporated however, due to a codicil made after the inventory.
Blackwell v Blackwell
Requirements for secret trusts: 1) Intention 2) Communication to secret trustee 3) Acquiesence by that trustee All must be met while inter vivos Example of a half secret trust: "for the purposes indicated by me to them". Must communicate terms before signing of the will as the Wills Act is engaged
Re Young
Intended beneficiary had not forfeited his legacy by witnessing the will as the secret trust exists independently from the will
Re Snowden, Brown v Pourau
Standard of proof required to establish a secret trust is BOP
McCormick v Grogan
Communication can be made after will is signed in the case of fully secret trusts (as long as accepted before death)
Re Walsh Re Karsten
Left property to Rev K on terms to be disclosed later. Held, couldnt vary the will once signed with unattested words. Rev to hold on resulting trust for estate ( don't get a beneficial interest). Also authority for HS trusts cannot contradict the will. NZ leading case followed this
Re Keen, Evershed v Griffiths
WRT FS trusts, terms can be revealed after the willmakers death, as long as the trustees have the means of finding out the terms (e.g. a sealed envelope).
Brown v Pourau
Failed on certainty of objects and intention, Hammond J thus suggesting ST are express trusts.