Windows Vista
#1
Posted 07 February 2007 - 06:09 AM
#2
Posted 07 February 2007 - 11:48 AM
I know there were some posts on it already.
Anyone with any experience? Will love to hear more ...
ProProfs.com: Educational FREEway By Professionals & Professors
#3
Posted 10 February 2007 - 08:31 AM
Edited by spy1954, 10 February 2007 - 09:27 AM.
#4
Posted 10 February 2007 - 11:27 AM
ProProfs.com: Educational FREEway By Professionals & Professors
#5
Posted 10 February 2007 - 11:47 AM
#6
Posted 10 February 2007 - 12:13 PM
Joshua
-----------------
A+ Certified
MCP 70-290
#7
Posted 14 February 2007 - 08:27 AM
I'm interested in Vista from the standpoint of an enthusiast who gets exited about any new OS, especially if eye candy is involved (I'm an artist). I've only played with it at my favorite tech stores, and from what I could tell, it actually seemed pretty fast, even on an Athalon 3000 (I think),single core machine with 512 MB of RAM, and the Home Basic, which in my opinion is nice to look at too. Oh yeah I'm really into the way it's written, too, and Vista has some fundamental differences. Once the early bugs are worked out, I plan to try out, on maybe a self-built rig.
#8
Posted 12 March 2007 - 10:59 AM
I wouldn't recommend getting it. My neighbour bought a new PC 2 weeks ago with Vista. It has an AMD3400+ processor and 512MB RAM. It's so slow to even do the simpliest of things such as opening up folders. And the worse thing is that I recommended him getting a new PC as his old one (Windows 98SE, AMD-K6, 128MB RAM) was really slow and picked out that one for him, which would be much faster and suitable for what he'd be using it for (surfing the net and word processing). There isn't a whole lot of extra speed with his new PC for running programs such as Word, etc. And if you're on the desktop for example and double click on "My Computer" (which is now called "Computer"), it takes about 3 seconds to open it whereas with XP it opens instantly. I'll probably have to get him some more RAM. However he only has 2 slots with 2 sticks of 256MB so that memory will no longer be any good if I get him 2 sticks of 512MB. Vista also uses memory for its resources. The 512MB only shows up as having something like 420MB.
I definitely would not buy it just yet. Maybe later on they might rewrite some of the software to speed it up but it's just too slow at the moment.
Edited by millsy5, 12 March 2007 - 11:11 AM.
#9
Posted 26 March 2007 - 02:38 PM
#10
Posted 26 March 2007 - 03:49 PM
The other problem is video. No DX10 cards that are any good let alone affordable, and if you want to run the aero you have to be running an expensive system. It just seems like that the OS needs way too much hardware to run smoothly, which is either an indication of poor coding, or worse, collusion between MS and hardware manufacturers to drive the market with this OS.
#11
Posted 27 March 2007 - 02:15 PM
#12
Posted 27 March 2007 - 06:55 PM
The other laptop is a HP Pavillion dv 6000t and it is running home premium and I simply love it from the glass like desktop to the windows aero i think its neat. Alot of old software games I have though is not compatible with either OS but for the most part I think its worth the upgrade. There is even a built in troubleshooter for a failed network connection (not only repair it gives detail info about the issue).
You can download a upgrade advisory from microsoft to see if your current pc is capable of running either 4 of the different OS.
I think it would be a good look if you are thinking about upgrading
A+ Certified
Network+ Certified
#13
Posted 03 April 2007 - 08:09 AM
#14
Posted 03 April 2007 - 12:53 PM
#15
Posted 14 April 2007 - 11:23 AM
I own a desktop pc and two laptops. All with very good specs, especialy my HP Pavilion dv6234ea
On the pavilion I have vista Home premium and on the other systems I'm playing around with Ultimate. But I must add that I still desire working on XP and dual boot xp and vista( THATS ANOTHER HEADACHE)
My point is, this is where alot of people will differ with me, but for me having Home Premium ther is no need for Ultimate, considering it only has the backup and bitlocker extra. And Home Premium has the media Centre on as well. For the former you can just use a better thrd party backup tool. I find imaging quite reliable and easy. All the work I have done on my xp machine for years now, just works fine. Except for the occasional software hickup.
Use it and see for yourself. The problem for me was the same, I heard what others said about it and that prvented me from trying it for myself. Its good reliable and I enjoy it.
In fact, I have Virtual PC 2007 running on it as wel, my virtual machines are Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows XP, SUSE 10.1
I do not have any complaints and would recommend it. But thats my opinion, and as I said I still work alot on XP
Have a good one!
#16
Posted 19 April 2007 - 03:56 AM
the theory being customers are buy vista machines and we need to know how they work to fix them
it seems to have much too much security for me setting the network up was not the easiest and i've set up hundreds, but it could well be what i'm used to, clashing with how it's gonna be now
back on xp at the moment as i'm still needing to use the computer and vista isn't user friendly enough for us tinkerers. even bought the idiots guide
I have home premium apparently i needed ultimate for networks, yeah right!
southern computer solutions
portsmouth England
#17
Posted 20 April 2007 - 09:39 PM
#18
Posted 23 April 2007 - 02:51 PM
Window Vista installation is quite easy more GUI, I had install three four times. I did like very much
#19
Posted 18 June 2007 - 05:01 AM
as ive only got OEM license for ultimate, im going to buy an xp pro licence next time i upgrade and stay with that till xp support runs out
---------------------
Comptia Network+ Certified - August 2007
Comptia A+ 220-601 & 220-602 Certified - March/April 2008
---------------------
Future projects: MCSA
---------------------
#20
Posted 19 June 2007 - 12:34 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
members, guests, anonymous users












